Chris Higgins

Writer and Filmmaker from Portland, Oregon
twitter google+ facebook linkedIn

Archive for the ‘Writing’ Category

Chris Higgins and His Porch

So check it out: I’m making a movie. It’s a documentary about the nature of money, and how money is changing. And I am asking you, today, to help me. If you have ten bucks you can part with, I want you to pre-order my movie so that it will get made.

The best part? It’s zero-risk. If I don’t bring in the full budget, you don’t pay anything — you keep your ten bucks. If I do meet the goal, you get a copy of my movie. And my movie will be awesome.

The thing is, this is not a movie about banks, or the recession, or the other stuff you might think about when you think “money documentary.” It’s about how money itself is changing from a physical thing — you know, like dollar bills and stuff — into a far more abstract notion. Many of us don’t carry cash anymore; we carry cards that tap into the cash some bank is holding for us (well, we hope the bank is holding it).

That transition from real to virtual is speeding up. Right now, people all over the world are using a kind of monetary system that sits outside of the banking system, with no cash anywhere to back it. It’s called cryptocurrency, and it’s very interesting stuff. It simultaneously has no value (it’s just bits on a computer), but you can use it to buy things. This is very interesting, and actually kind of amazing. Some people think it’s going to replace our monetary system; others think it’s a scam. I’m somewhere in the middle. That middle is where the movie gets made.

But here’s the thing: in order to make the movie, I need a thousand of my closest friends to chip in ten bucks. I’ve been working on this movie for five months, with my close friend Adam Cornelius (a fantastic director and deep thinker), and we’re out of dough. I want to make this movie, but it takes a village to fund something this big. If I’ve ever done you a favor, this is how I want to be repaid. If I haven’t done you a favor lately, I want to owe you one.

Okay, But What’s Actually in this Movie?

I’m going to level with you: this video is nerdy. There are going to be words in here (like “Dogecoin”) that you may not have heard, or that just seem made-up. That’s because they are totally made-up. But if you’re the kind of person who likes to watch a video about a thing, you can watch this:

I think it’s important to note: That’s not the movie. That’s a video trying to raise money on the internet for the movie. I promise that the movie will be, you know, movie-length, and also “fun to watch,” and have “pictures of people doing more things” in it. It will also have a lot less of me ranting about things on my back porch.

So Where Do I Put My Money?

I’m using Kickstarter to fund the movie. If you haven’t signed up, it’s easy — you can even use your Facebook account to sign in. Kickstarter is a great resource for filmmakers, because it allows us to put the project out there, tell you our budget ($72,000), and ask for people to come together and say, yes, I would pay ten bucks to watch that. If you guys come along and commit $72,000 to the movie, it happens. If we don’t hit our goal, the movie does not get made, and you are not charged. But it totally won’t get made if nobody even expresses interest. We don’t get partial funding here, folks — all or nothing.

So. Here’s the place to go to give me ten bucks. It even emails me when you pledge, so if we’re friends in the real world, know that my phone will light up and tell me that you pledged. That means the world to me. And yeah, if you give more than ten bucks, that’s super great (you can get bonus features for $15, or at $20 you also get a whole other movie Adam directed and I helped with — it’s about Tetris!). But what I’m asking for is the basics. Ten bucks, and my thanks.

Thank you for reading, and hugs from Portland.

2013 By the Numbers

1 January, 2014
Tetris masters look on at the final match in the 2013 Classic Tetris World Championship.

I don’t think I’ve done a year-in-review post before, since they seem kind of braggy. Then again, I’m trying to sell books about writing here, so why not.

2013 was a huge year for me, both personally and professionally. Here are some quantifiable reasons why:

5 Features Written for The Magazine – Starting on January 3, 2013, I wrote a series of five reported stories for The Magazine, and I’m immensely proud of that work. I have done magazine work before, but this is the year I cranked into gear. Stay tuned for 2014, as there’s way more where that came from. (Funny — the day I posted this review, a sixth feature was published. But that goes in the 2014 bucket.)

44 Hours of Interview Audio Recorded – Oy, this makes me tired just typing it.

2 Books Published: The Blogger Abides (by me), and Breakfast on Mars (with 36 other nice authors). Long story short, I wrote a book about writing, and people seem to like it. I contributed the title essay (and a second essay) to a book for kids about writing essays, and people seem to like it.

304 Blog Posts Written for mental_floss – It actually might be more, but this is what I had listed in my notes. I’ve been writing a daily column for the lovely folks at mental_floss since 2007. Pretty soon I’ll get my wings.

2 Speaking Gigs – UC Davis, talking about The Blogger Abides; and Ziba Design, talking about the Monkey Puzzle Trees of Portland (you kinda had to be there).

1 Book Signing – San Francisco, signing Breakfast on Mars at The Booksmith. It was a fun event, and proves my motto: always bring your own Sharpie. (I recommend the silver ones, they stand out nicely.) Still haven’t made a print version of the other book, so no signing parties there.

1 Tetris Tournament Refereed – I was Head Referee at this year’s Classic Tetris World Championship, which is where that photo above comes from (taken during the tense final match). The difference between Head Ref and Regular Ref (the latter is what I did in 2012 and led to this article) is mostly a matter of perspective.

2 Reporting Trips – I traveled to Seattle and San Francisco to report on stories. It’s a privilege to be able to go and see people where they work, and stay with friends while you do it. Thank you, Sabrina and Connor!

18 Articles Written for Pearson – I’m not sure if these are published yet, or if they’ll have my name on them. In any case, I wrote a nice set of articles for kids. I’m probably contractually obligated not to say much more, aside from it being some of the best totally reading-level-appropriate material your kid’s gonna read next year. (Ahem.)

12,828 Photos Taken – Uh, I took too many pictures this year. A few thousand of those were for the Trek in the Park feature for The Magazine. My big take-away: the Nikon D7100 is a dramatically better camera than my old D7000. “Old.” Hah!

409 flower bulbs planted – And I still have a few dozen waiting in the crawlspace. I’ve been busy.

11 African Violets Propagated – Including two vigorous clones from an Optimara “space violet” I bought the day I moved to Portland, nearly fourteen years ago. I got it at a New Seasons or a Whole Foods, I can’t remember which. In any case, cloning is totally a thing!

1 Tweeter Replaced – It took me years, but I finally found a working replacement tweeter for my Bowers & Wilkins DM603 speaker. This is a big deal if you’re a dork like me with a blown tweeter.

1 Day Job Quit – I’m proud of the work I’ve done in technology, and immensely grateful to the friends who have worked with me on it. But the truth is my heart is less in software and more in words lately, so I had to hang up my software-writing hat in 2013.

1 Wedding & 9 Wedding Receptions – Rochelle and I were married this year, and that’s really the biggest headline here. She supported me in doing all the stuff above, and I quite literally could not have done it without her — she is my first reader and informal editor on everything that goes to print. After our wedding, we hosted nine tiny receptions at our house through the summer and fall. Pro tip: people love a garden party…but only when it’s above 60 degrees outside. I would offer you another pro tip about whom to marry, but she’s taken.

Reading through this list, it seems like both a lot and a little — part of me aches that I didn’t do more (I think I could have, if I had tried harder), though the larger part sits back and says, “That’ll do, pig.”

I have plenty of work ahead of me, but I’m going to take the evening off. Please send me your year-end list, and take a moment to be proud of your achievements. Then — back to work!

Adam Rosko (Captain Kirk) is buried by Tribbles

2013 has been a year of professional changes for me, and the most satisfying has been publishing five feature articles in The Magazine. The Magazine is in the final days of crowdfunding a hardcover book (plus ebook version) featuring 25 articles from its first year, and I’m asking for you to back the project. This means a lot to me. Here’s why:

1. The Magazine Is Good for Writers

I’m a working writer. I write articles, I get paid for them, I pay the mortgage with that money. The Magazine has extremely reasonable and writer-friendly contract terms. The typical contract you sign as a writer is like, “MegaGlobalCorp owns your ass, and you’ll be lucky to receive $0.50 for your work. You promise to give back the $0.50 if MegaGlobalCorp ever gets angry. Do not taunt MegaGlobalCorp.”

The contract offered by The Magazine is a shining model of reason, simplicity, and fairness. I’d summarize it: “You own your ass. The Magazine would like to pay you well to run a product of said ass on a limited basis. Oh, and we pay photographers and illustrators too.” It’s like signing a contract with a puppy, using a unicorn horn as a pen. An actual for-profit publication runs like this. That matters, folks.

Oh yeah, and despite not having any contractual obligation to do so, The Magazine will pay writers, photographers, and illustrators to re-run our work in this book. Why? Because The Magazine is good to its contributors and recognizes that we’re all in this together.

2. The Magazine Is Good for Readers

You can read The Magazine on your Kindle (I do!). Or on their website (also mobile-optimized). Or your iPad, using a beautiful native app. Or your iPhone. It costs TWO BUCKS to access EVERY BACK ISSUE EVER for a month (or $20 a year). It’s published every two weeks. Every issue includes a free article in case you don’t subscribe. There are no advertisements. Show me another magazine of this quality with this level of generosity to its readers. (By the way, the Kickstarter offers discounted $15/year subscriptions…you should get one. I hear they make great gifts, too.)

Oh yeah, and you can download all the back issues in .mobi (Kindle) or .epub (other e-reader) formats and keep them forever, even if you cancel your subscription. And Glenn Fleishman, the editor, even tells people this on Twitter — it’s not a sneaky thing, it’s just how this magazine works. To quote the Bluth family, “COME ON!”

3. I Write for The Magazine a Lot

I ran the numbers in May to figure out who writes for The Magazine. I ran them again in August, just before a few more of my articles were published. I have put serious effort into becoming a frequent contributor, and I want that to count. I’ve already been paid well for my efforts, and recognized by readers (that’s especially nice — thanks, y’all), but I have an interest in the ongoing health of this publication. I want to keep writing for it, and I want more people to say, “Oh yeah, I love The Magazine!” When I began writing for mental_floss in 2006, I got blank stares when I mentioned the name. Now, I get a ton of “Oh yeah, I love mental_floss!” That only happens when the publication puts out great stuff consistently, and readers pay for it.

Long story short: the more The Magazine succeeds, the more my early choice to bet on this horse pays off (metaphorically, anyway).

4. The Magazine is an Honest Experiment

When Marco Arment started this thing, he dubbed it an experiment, and Glenn Fleishman (its longtime editor and now also owner) has continued that tradition. Glenn has branched out into running some Magazine work on Medium, and I wrote a little item on The Unipiper for that. There’s a podcast in the works. Now Glenn is dipping his toe into print. While I have no inside information, I suspect that if The Magazine succeeds with this first book, we can expect future annual books as well.

I would be very pleased if someday The Magazine had a regularly-scheduled print component (even if it’s quarterly — in fact, perhaps it’d be best as a quarterly), so it can reach people who prefer to read on paper. But because this is an experiment, we’ll just have to see what happens. If people decide that print is worth it, great. If they don’t, that’s a bummer, but it’s an important data point.

5. The Magazine Would Never Publish a Listicle Like This

In my book about writing, I decry the listicle format as the dumbening of online writing. For professional reasons, I am often called upon to write lists, and have made my peace with that. But you know what? The Magazine is not dumb. It does not run dumb lists. It does not stoop to click-bait headlines. It does not have ads. Let us celebrate a thing that is not dumb.

In Summary

The Magazine is a wonderful publication. You can read all about the Kickstarter campaign, and I urge you to chip in. As I write this, there are still some “early bird” $30 print book/ebook combo packs available. The campaign is in its final three days, and still needs your support — the dollar goal has not yet been achieved. If you support me as a writer, please buy this book.

A photo of the author reading a Kindle Paperwhite.

Back in May, I looked at who was writing for The Magazine. At the time, the data collection was labor-intensive (The Magazine didn’t have author pages yet), and I was trying to figure out who was returning to this publication to write again.

So why did I care? Mainly because I wanted to be near the top of that list, and I was. But since that analysis in May, things have changed quite a bit.

Top Contributors (By Number of Articles)

As of August 20, 2013:

  1. Lex Friedman, 6
  2. Alison Hallett, 4
  3. Chris Stokel-Walker, 4
  4. Glenn Fleishman, 3
  5. Chris Higgins, 3
  6. Eli Sanders, 3 (in one issue)
  7. Jason Snell, 2
  8. Daniel Rutter, 2
  9. Marco Arment, 2
  10. Dan Moren, 2
  11. John Moltz, 2
  12. Serenity Caldwell, 2
  13. Mark Harris, 2
  14. Chris Breen, 2
  15. Marco Tabini, 2
  16. Mark Siegal, 2
  17. Erin McKean, 2
  18. Gabe Bullard, 2
  19. Brittany Shoot, 2
  20. Nancy Gohring, 2
  21. Joe Ray, 2

A note on ordering in the above: I ordered first by number of articles, then by seniority (the latter defined as who appeared first in The Magazine). I also don’t include any of Glenn’s Editor’s Notes or the introductory essay. If you want the raw data, contact me.

What’s New?

If I compare this to the old list, here’s what jumps out:

  1. Lex Friedman is still on top. In May he had 5 stories, now he has 6. He’s beatable. He’s slowing down. Still, his performance is impressive.
  2. I’m way down the list. This is most interesting to me, obviously, but I went from #2 to #5 mainly because…
  3. Alison Hallett & Chris Stokel-Walker are killing it. Alison appeared on the previous list, but Chris did not. While I was out watering the garden, they were writing the words.
  4. The list is much longer. Previous there were 12 writers who had contributed two or more stories. Now the list has swelled to 21. The total number of writers who have contributed any stories is 86 (!) and we still see issues penned wholly by first-time contributors.

What Now?

I intend to keep climbing the ladder (stay tuned for next week’s issue). I may be the only person keeping track, but I feel that I’m in good company on that (growing) list above. We’re closing in on the one-year anniversary of The Magazine — it’ll be interesting to see where things sit at that point.

It’s also important to emphasize that, like I said above, there are a lot of first-timers showing up in the overall author list — the ratio of one-time contributors to repeat contributors is roughly 4:1. This means that you should pitch a story idea without fear that if you’re not established you won’t have a place. The Magazine is still very young, and there’s a tremendous opportunity here to connect with an audience — while retaining valuable rights to your work.

Oh yeah, and there’s a Portland, Oregon meetup on September 18th. I’ll be there, along with my new nemesis colleague Alison Hallett and lots of other writers and designers. Come to there! Drink the drinks!

Surveyor's Marker atop Rocky Butter in Portland, Oregon

When I set about writing a book about blogging, I wasn’t sure that people would get it. I knew that people wanted to know about professional blogging (because they kept asking me, “How is that you write words on the internet for money?”), but I also knew that the honest answer would be sort of a bummer: “It’s hard work, for low pay, it took a long time to get good at it, and no, I don’t have a free job for you.”

But I wrote the book anyway, complete with its “Sorry, this is hard” message, and people have been getting it anyway, and that’s kinda blowing my mind. My pitch is simple: this is the real, hard, dumb, breaking-rocks job I do, complete with long rants essays about paying your taxes. The cover shows a befuddled kid. There are no money-bags on there. There is no numbered list of “secrets.” It’s really long, at least by how-to book standards. And still, people are reading the thing — many are actually starting new blogs because of it. So, here, a roundup for recent reviews by people who get it.

Gilbert Tang, Jr.

Gilbert gets it. He writes:

Nearly every book I have read on professional blogging is total bullshit. I won’t do you the disservice of linking to any of them here. Abides, however, is the first book I’ve come across that sets the record straight by honestly discussing the stuff that matters.

Bonus points for going ahead and owning the word “bullshit” there.

Tom Owens

Tom gets it. In an open letter, he writes:

Thank you, Chris Higgins.

Your Kindle e-book cover breaks the mold. There’s no dollar sign image, no sack of money. The only bone you throw to dreamy get-rich-quick bloggers is your subtitle:

“A Practical Guide to Writing Well And Not Starving.”

You are honest, detailed and real. In your “Living Small” chapter, you reveal the secret to being fiscal survival as a self-employed writer…

“The answer turned out to be staggeringly simple: they didn’t buy anything.”

True story: editor Adrienne Crezo and I went back and forth on titles and subtitles for a while. An early favorite of mine was How to Write for an Extremely Modest Living. Then I went nuts and chose a Big Lebowski reference instead.

Chris Gonzales

Chris gets it. Again, he cites the anti-message at the core of the book:

This isn’t one of those lame How-to-Become-a-Pro-Blogger books; it’s actually full of useful information one would need if they ever go freelance.

Meg Stivison

Meg gets it. She wrote an early review (thank you, early reviewers!) noting how the book is positioned at this special category of not-quite-beginning writers:

The whole thing was sort of ideal for me, because it hits a middle experience level, assuming readers aren’t exactly negotiating a larger advance on their next book, but they have some clips and a couple outlets, and would like to take freelance writing from a hobby that pays for coffee and magazines into a full career. Or at least the expensive coffee. It’s not always easy to find a guide that hits that middle area, on turning an art into a business.

And Now the Hard Sell

Listen, people. The Blogger Abides makes a great gift. Especially a gift for yourself — and it’s only four bucks.

Photo: iPad showing The Magazine app, resting on a wooden bench

In its fifteenth issue, The Magazine ran my piece Second Wind, which happened to be my third for the publication. But who’s counting? I am. And why? Because Lex Friedman must be stopped.

Yes, dear readers, Lex has taken control of our reading minds from deep within his moon base New Jersey office. He has contributed articles to one-third of The Magazine’s issues. At this rate, I project that his super laser writing will supplant all other forms of human communication by early 2014.

I’m Coming for You, Lex…

I’m currently at a cabin without reliable access to the internet. But that doesn’t stop me from my mission: to find out who writes for The Magazine, and how much. Using a tin can attached to a mobile hotspot, I went through the extant issues and made a little spreadsheet (96k ZIP) of who wrote what and when. Results are below. (Also, please feel free to use the data to do your own analysis — for instance, you could figure out the gender balance in later issues, if you’re into that kind of thing.)

Top Contributors (By Number of Articles)

As of May 3, 2013:

  1. Lex Friedman, 5
  2. Chris Higgins, 3
  3. Eli Sanders, 3 (in one issue)
  4. Jason Snell, 2
  5. Marco Arment, 2
  6. Daniel Rutter, 2
  7. Dan Moren, 2
  8. Glenn Fleishman, 2
  9. Serenity Caldwell, 2
  10. Alison Hallett, 2
  11. Chris Breen, 2
  12. Mark Siegal, 2

A note on ordering in the above: I ordered first by number of articles, then by seniority (the latter defined as who appeared first in The Magazine).

In my analysis I didn’t include Marco’s introductory essay (the preface to the publication as a whole), as it doesn’t appear as an article on the website’s table of contents for any issue. If you include that, he’s a three-time contributor. Glenn’s Editor’s Notes have also been excluded, as they appear in four issues (looks like an every-issue item now) and are not “articles” per se.

The Early Crew

The first issue featured an impressive lineup: Guy English, Jason Snell, Alex Payne, and Michael Lopp (aka Rands) plus the aforementioned intro piece by Marco Arment. Only Snell went on to contribute again. It’s in the second issue that we see the rise of Friedman; that second issue includes contributions from John Siracusa, Gina Trapani, Lex Friedman, Daniel Rutter, Alex Knight, and Marco Arment. Of that second-issue crew, Lex, Brad, and Marco all returned. That pattern of repeat contributions holds up in later issues.

Rinse, Repeat

After Issue 2, almost every issue of The Magazine includes at least one repeat contributor. The exceptions are Issue 7 (where my first article appeared) and Issue 13 (with its epic 3-part piece by Eli Sanders). Of the 59 total contributors, 12 are repeat contributors.

Why does this matter? It means that a strong percentage of those who write for The Magazine are coming back and pitching again. This is significant. As a longtime freelancer, I’ve written for plenty of publications just once. A willingness to return to The Magazine indicates some mixture of enthusiasm for its format, editorial practices (read: Glenn), business, and the ease of pitching. I can tell you firsthand that The Magazine is the fastest-paying gig I’ve ever encountered — a check arrived two days after publication in the most recent case. This is insanely fast by “publishing industry” standards (where getting a check a 4-6 weeks “ish” after publication is nice if you can get it). This indicates a well-run business (or at least one that is well-funded enough to be generous with its cash flow), which is frankly a huge factor in whether writers return to the well.

The other big factor that likely encourages repeat contributors is the liberal terms of the contract. Here’s an oversimplified version: contributors may resell or otherwise reuse the work they first publish in The Magazine after about a month. This is a big deal (and unusual in magazine journalism), because it means contributors have more business opportunities for their work down the line. Want to sell a movie option on your piece? No problem, you own those rights. Want to anthologize your work and sell it on your own? Cool, go for it. Want to give it away for free on your website? Also cool. Want to expand it into a longer-form piece and sell that? Great! The emergence of interesting business models here is a huge reason why I think of The Magazine first when I pitch a story these days. I want long-term ownership of my work, and this is a rare publishing venue with a combination of good pay, a great contract, and fantastic editorial practices. What’s not to love?

Pitch On

By the time I return from my superfortress coast cabin, another issue will be out and another writer may join the ranks of the 3-time contributors’ list. It’s also possible that Lex will hit 6, in which case I’ll have to deploy peacekeeping forces.

Regardless, this is a fascinating time for The Magazine: it is still young enough that new contributors can enter the field and quickly become part of the repeat contributors’ list. But it’s mature enough that we know what it is, and we can observe some encouraging trends. Pitch on, fellow writers.

View of Manzanita beach, Oregon

It has been an eventful six weeks for me, having published my first book, published a feature article in The Magazine, quit my day job, and still avoided starving to death. I thought I’d share some thoughts on how this is going, in case other writers wonder, “Hey, what’s it like to launch your first book?” or “So what happens after you publish a story in The Magazine?”

The Book

My fiancée Rochelle and I spent Christmas and the following week at the Oregon coast. Being a workaholic, I took this opportunity to complete The Blogger Abides, which entailed reading through it several times, fixing tons of typos (I still failed to catch many of them), and finishing up Kindle formatting issues I’d been sitting on for several months. I submitted the book to Amazon on December 30, 2012 assuming it would take 48 hours to publish — hoping to launch the book on January 1, 2013. And of course, it just insta-published a few hours after submission. Oh well. I had a glass of port and bought myself a copy, then enjoyed an extended stay in the hot tub.

When the book launched, a series of unexpected things happened:

  1. I had no idea what to do anymore. While I’d been writing the book, there was always something concrete and book-related on my to-do list. Once I pushed the button to publish, I was in this new world where I could choose either to “market” the book (yuck) or just sit there and do nothing. Or write a new book. What to do? This was supremely uncomfortable, and was completely unexpected. There was no “yay” moment upon publication (aside from the aforementioned port and hot tub). It was simply the beginning of a new, uncomfortable phase in which my daily sense of success would be measured by sales rather than, you know, “writing.”
  2. I got depressed. Related to the first point, I felt genuinely blue. I couldn’t put my finger on it. Part of it was probably that my awesome vacation was also ending, but the other part was that I had assumed publishing the book would mean something for me emotionally — would change something within me. And really, like most things I’ve published, it didn’t give me much of a feeling of accomplishment. After a few days I got back to normal, but this blue period was truly unexpected. One lesson I’ve learned as a blogger is that negative feedback stings; positive feedback is modestly helpful; and no feedback is deadly. In those first days with the book, I had a little positive feedback from friends and family (who can trust them to be impartial?), but no feedback from anybody else. It was only when I got positive reviews from unknown people that I started to think, hey, this book might actually be useful. That is when the “yay” moments began.
  3. I learned about ebook marketing. I don’t think of myself as a marketing guy. But let me tell you, as soon as I had a book to market, I had to become one. So writing guest blogs, getting reviews, and moving units became part of my daily routine. I’m still new to this mode, and it still feels odd, but that’s because I’ve never had to market my own work before — it has always been in some publication, so that stuff was handled for me. I’ve been writing forever; I’ve been marketing for six weeks. It still feels icky. (Incidentally, the book makes a great gift!)

I set a modest sales goal: 100 units in the first month. For a four-dollar book, this seemed very achievable. I topped that goal in the first week. By the end of the first month, I’d more than doubled it. I’ll be speaking next month in California about the book and re-engaging with the marketing side of things, so perhaps I’ll see even more sales then.

Authorial side-note: although The Blogger Abides is the first book I’ve published, I have actually written six or seven full-length books, depending on how you count — mostly fiction, and several for money. So while I have completed book-length work before, including finishing edits with big fancy editors and all that, something always intervened to kill the book between completion and the ability for people to buy it. Not this time.

The Magazine

In a surprising coincidence, The Magazine ran my feature story on competitive Tetris players on January 3, just a few days after the book launched. It was the first (and I daresay lead) article in Issue 7. I knew that The Magazine was a big deal, but I didn’t know just how big. Within hours, I was overwhelmed with the flood of new Twitter followers and readers writing in to say how much they enjoyed it. I was also pleased that the subjects of the profile finally got to read the piece and liked it too.

But here’s the thing: running that feature story in The Magazine was a far bigger deal than publishing my own book. I didn’t expect that. But so far, it has paid me more money, earned me more goodwill and attention, and generally increased my profile far, far more than the book. The book is just another thing I did, but this Tetris article? Apparently to many readers, this is pure gold. (And let’s be clear, I’m very proud of the article, it was hard work, and the editorial touch Glenn Fleishman brought to the writing made it sing.) But that article was a few months of occasional work plus some research when I felt like it, not the eighteen-ish months of hard labor I put into the book.

Nerdy side-note: I’m not sure what The Magazine’s readership is. Because I had so much extra material for the Tetris story, I added a “Special Features” link at the end of my article. Readers could optionally visit that page for videos and stuff. Although I didn’t plan it this way, tracking visitors to that page gives me a rough sense not of readership, but perhaps of ultra-engaged readership of my particular article (and how this readership changes over time). I’m not ready to share that breakdown now, but let’s just say I think The Magazine has more readers than I expected. (I had to put WP-SuperCache in “Lock Down” mode.)

Because The Magazine is very cool, they allowed me (like all their authors) to republish my article after a one-month exclusive in their app. So I ran it on my blog on February 3, 2013. (Glenn even exported the final marked-up version and emailed it to me — something no other editor has done.) In the ensuing two-week-ish period, more than 25,000 people have read that article on my site. This is astounding, and it validates my decision to run it on my site.

I had run through a bunch of scenarios during that month about how to squeeze yet more money out of this article, but also expose it to more readers — I had thought about selling it as a Kindle ebook for a dollar, with extra text and photos; thought about pitching it to Wired as an expanded story; thought about all kinds of ways to try to get more money. But it’s not really about the money. At the end of the day, my readers were saying: let me read it, online, for free, pretty please. So I figured that was the easiest path and it would make the most people genuinely happy. I already made plenty of money on it, and if a few of those web readers picked up my book, good for me, right?

The “free on my website” strategy has worked out extremely well. I suspect that if I had tried to sell this as a $0.99 Kindle ebook, I would’ve sold fifty units and had a bunch of angry reviews complaining that it was “only” four thousand words and a few photos. If I’d pitched it to some other magazine, it’d still be in development (or the pitch might not have landed). As it is now, people are calling this the first must-read blog post of the year, a completely fascinating read, and even using lines from it in a poem. Not bad. And yeah, some Tetris article readers have bought my book too.

So, future contributors to The Magazine — it’s up to you what you do with your work after its initial run, but this approach worked for me. It meant the piece reached lots more readers, I actually made a little more money (in the form of book sales), and a few extremely classy readers even bought me stuff on my Amazon wish list as a thank-you. That is absurdly nice.

The Former Day Job

When I launched my book, I still had a thirty-hour-a-week day job. I was hedging my bets (well, paying my mortgage) by working in tech with a group of friends I’ve known and worked with for over a decade. I left that job, with hugs all around, on the last day of January. I’m still doing some tech consulting (partly to close loose ends with those friends — projects don’t end cleanly on month boundaries), but this frees me up to spend most of my days working on actual writing and reporting. At the same time, a few big leads jumped up and bit me on the nose. So I’ve been chasing down those leads. Stay tuned, everybody.

Oh Yeah, the Book

I’m preparing a second edition, fixing some awful typos, restoring emdashes (they are endashes in the current version), and putting out a print-on-demand version. That should be complete by March, in time for me to speak to the good students of UC Davis about all this stuff. If you’re in the area, come and see me — it’s free.